An Observation on the Impending Death of Materialism and the Rise of Wonder
Let's get woo for a hot second
The following is a free post. If you’d like access to all subscribers-only features, our full archives, podcasts, and every post, you can subscribe for just $8/month or $80 per year, right here:
Writing is how I support my family, so if you like what you see here, please consider a subscription so I can keep doing this!
If you’ve already subscribed but would like to buy me a coffee to help keep me fueled up for writing, you can do that here:
Alternatively, I would gratefully accept your patronage at my Paypal. Your contributions have been a huge help during a very financially challenging time. Thank you!
There's a growing movement towards the death of materialism, because our science has become dogmatic scientism, and it cannot provide answers for many of the most basic questions like "what is consciousness and where does it reside and how does it work?"
Quantum physics has also undermined the tenets of materialism, from the collapse of waveforms when observed to the lightspeed breaking capacities of quantum teleportation to the possibility that the human mind may itself be a quantum computer capable of entangling with the energies of the universe and manifesting realities through its own power.
We are faced with incessant warnings about the presence of non human intelligences; we have learned that some of the least valued people on the planet may in fact have superhuman telepathic abilities and deep, perspicacious intellects. We are realizing that space-time collapses at the Planck scale. We do not understand what most of the matter in the universe actually is or where it hides. There are more galaxies than there are grains of sand on Earth.
We are learning that resonances and frequencies can heal, that we are truly energetic beings, and even that we may have doppelgangers in an infinitude of branching timelines across a limitless multiverse.
We are entering an age of wonders.
But traditional religion offers only a closed epistemology; a list of things we must and must not believe, no matter how substantial the evidence. We have long been taught to ignore the evidence and where it leads us.
This paradigm will never hold up in the age we are embarking on. It is far too limited by design.
I can't see a way to make these things compatible. Too much is circumscribed and declared off limits. Too many possibilities are dismissed a priori because they appear to be threats to existing views.
So while we are approaching an epoch of re-enchantment, I’m unable to imagine how this can happen without transcending old ideas that no longer serve the reality laid out before us.
I won’t preclude any possibility. But the problem I see is just how much precluding religion does.
It can have to do with the perspective with which one approaches religion.
If you approach religion with a primarily positivist/rational perspective -- that is, primarily viewing tenets and things like that at face value -- you can run into the issue you've identified.
If you approach it with a more "mystical" (for lack of a better word) perspective, some of these kinds of tensions and limitations can be alleviated, or relaxed, in practice because while these claims are not denied, they are understood through a mystical lens which tends to be more flexible in practice. The advantage of this is that it remains somewhat moored to the "traditional" faith while at the same time remaining much more open (often radically so) to the kinds of insights which can come from a mystical praxis and understanding.
The latter is unfortunately not for everyone. For many it feels too unmoored from a more plainly rational approach (it's more supra-rational in practice). And it isn't just a question of mindset, but of praxis: that is, it tends to arise from certain practices (certain kinds of prayer, in particular) which then give rise to a shift in perspective and emphasis interiorly, rather than trying to do that only mentally -- the mental shift tends to arise from spiritual praxis rather than the reverse. The key shift is towards an emphasis on the praxis and spiritual growth, which then informs a more flexible understanding of doctrines and the like (while retaining formal "orthodoxy" in these areas), rather than an emphasis on the nitty-gritty of "official" teaching, rules and so on.
Of course, you can also get completely unmoored, especially if you try to embark on that without any guide -- either personal/living (best) or written. And you may just not be of the proper mental mindset for this approach to be fruitful, as noted. I do think, though, that if you approach religion of any sort -- whether Christian or otherwise -- in 2025 and beyond with a conventional focus on the rational/face value aspect of them, it can be very difficult to sustain without some degree of double-talk at some stage.
What's the problem? Jesus worked miracles. He made blind people see and cripples walk and deaf people speak and cured leprosy--and raised people from the dead. He could walk on water (suspending the laws of physics) and make St. Peter walk on water. Christ levitated into the skies (Ascension) and presumably disappeared into thin air, only to appear again bodily to the Apostles. St. Teresa of Avila and St. John of the Cross would levitate during prayer on occasion. St. Teresa didn't like it and asked her nuns to try to kneel on her habit to stop the levitating but they gave up (I guess her clothes were about to rend, but I wasn't there.) (If I'd been in her company, I would have flat out refused to kneel on her garments to hold her down during prayer, because I would have figured that's not what God wanted.) Can the devil levitate people? Yes, I've read of exorcists who encounter levitation of the penitent, but I don't think they try to counteract it by touch, they pray the person down from the ceiling, etc. (See "The Exocist" movie, which was based on a true case of possession, or listen to all the youtubes by various exorcists like Father Chad Ripperger, Monsignor Stephen Rossetti, Fr. Dan Rehill, Fr. Carlos Martins or Fr. Vincent Lampert).
Padre Pio could read minds. One would go into confession and Padre Pio could tell you the sins you left out. Padre Pio could also sense impenitence and sometimes he'd throw the impenitent confessor out of the closet. He hardly ate his entire life but had normal weight (same for other saints of blesseds). What about incorruptibles? How is that happening? God, suspending the laws of science. Padre Pio could bilocate, including into the air (directing pilots in WW2 according to some US pilot testimony). He would come to people in their dreams (Padre Pio). If there are interdimensional creatures, what's the problem? We don't know exactly what that means ("interdimentional"). We can fit everything into the Christian paradigm, which is "God made everything that is". Multiverse? God made it. I don't think I'm in another universe doing something different, however. No one can convince me of that.