Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Deely's avatar

This isn’t really an option on the survey, so I’m just going to post it as a comment.

And please take all of this with a huge grain of salt, since we don’t know each other in real life. I’m only commenting because your loss of faith sounds EXACTLY like my own and you specifically asked for opinions.

I think you should write about the stuff you like to write about a couple of times per month (or whatever feels best for you) and have maybe one free post per month about the religious stuff and one paid post per month that’s more personal. Anything more than that on those two topics is probably too much personal exposure (and I say this as someone who has found your writing about your loss of faith deeply helpful, since it made me feel so much less alone), but it seems like that’s something that is important enough to you that you probably shouldn’t stop writing about it completely. But it seems to me that it’s wise to start shifting away from religion being such a large part of your public identity. Otherwise you’re just going to end up as the “anti-Trad” guy permanently.

And if it seems like it’s gonna be a lot to manage two substacks, don’t. Just have one, but give people the option to subscribe to the specific “series” they are interested in.

Hilary White's avatar

Here's my take:

1) you really like the second group of stuff. Like, a LOT. For you, that's the stuff. It's fun, it's fascinating, it's got a lot going on in the world about it that's worth your attention. It cheers you up and energises you. it draws you out of yourself and gets your imagination (fiction!) revving. And there's never going to be a ceiling. There's no end to that stuff. It's always going to interest you (because it always has) and will always draw a crowd of others like you.

2) you have a totally different emotional/spiritual reaction to the other stuff. It's way less fun, way more painful. It's difficult and fraught and tends to drive you into yourself. Now, if Substack were therapy, that might be a price worth paying for spiritual growth/psychological and emotional healing. But it's not. It's a blog full of 2000 strangers.

The thing Substack has shown us is that there really is an audience out there for absolutely anything, and it can be a living if you're applying yourself to it with reasonable diligence. And putting extra work in really brings a lot of rewards because really there isn't a ceiling in terms of the size of audience if it's a niche/interest that's out there in the world.

So, in fact, you don't need to take a poll; you need to decide what you actually want to get out of this thing. Do you want the (in my opinion dubious) benefits of a self-revelatory business of talking about stuff that, frankly, brings you down? And I think the selfie blogs have a way lower ceiling for audience growth; there's only so much of that stuff anyone is interested in. Eventually it gets old. Unless you're the one offering the therapy, I think the range is too limited.

Also, when you've actually finished healing, all that stuff gets to be a lot less interesting. I was having a conversation with a friend the other night over dinner, and she said to her daughter who was with us, "Hilary's the world's biggest Beatles fan." (It's not true. I'm very rational about them...) And I immediately and without hesitation said, "That's only because I'm not mad at my mother anymore." She was the one who brought the Beatles into my life, and I was raised with them as the soundtrack of my earliest life. Unfortunately that meant that my rage at my mother was kind of transferred onto their music, so I couldn't like it. It was at exactly the moment I said it to my friend that I realised it was true: a lifetime of anger had somehow evaporated. And that was exactly why the Beatles' music no longer generated those ancient negative feelings. And I think it's why I'm able to be so laser focused on what I'm doing, and put so much energy into it. Why it is interesting enough for me now that I have to force myself to stop working every day at 8pm and take one day off a week. When my mental energy was taken up with dealing with all that guddawful childhood/teenage years stuff there wasn't very much juice left for anything else. And it was more appealing to talk about myself, my brain and my personal difficulties. Now all that stuff is just ... well... kind of old news. And other stuff is WAY more fun and engaging.

So, I think the idea of talking about The Stuff for a living might end up being a pretty big miscalculation. To recap: You don't really like it. You like the other stuff way more. It doesn't have the high audience ceiling that the other way more fun stuff does, and you'll probably not be able to maintain people's interest long-term. You don't really want a reputation as the guy who talks about his problems in public; you want a reputation for being the guy who's big into and able to make interesting a lot of stuff that really is massively relevant to the general culture. And you won't ever grow out of it and get bored as your mental, emotional and spiritual health improves. In fact, the opposite; the more betterer you feel the more fun it will become.

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?